![](https://crier.co/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/2c809aaaed261cb7eccc90a793971d19.png)
Democratic Coup? Did The Party Leaders Hijack Democracy by Hand-Picking The Presidential Nominee Without a Vote?
![](https://crier.co/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/113904964_highfive-778x350.jpg)
Every Democrat knew Joe Biden couldn’t run for office.
They set him up to embarrass himself at the debate with Trump.
Now they’re robbing their voters of a choice in the nominee so their party elites can choose!
Hijacking democracy!
— Jim Banks (@Jim_Banks) July 21, 2024
I feel like I’m taking crazy pills when the left keep calling Trump a threat to Democracy when the Dems didn’t let their own party vote for their candidate. It’s insane!!!! #sticktopizza pic.twitter.com/a75kNU6Baa
— Dave Portnoy (@stoolpresidente) July 22, 2024
Just so everyone understands this. Kamala Harris became the Democrat nominee for president of the United States without one vote being cast for her by the American people.
But remember: President Trump is a threat to your democracy. 🙄
— The Nasty Italian🍷🇺🇸 🇮🇹 (@sayitnspinit) July 23, 2024
The Party of ‘Democracy!!!’
KAMALA: “We have earned the support of enough delegates to secure the Democrat nomination!”
How do you ‘earn the support’ of a delegate without receiving a single vote? 🤔pic.twitter.com/XkgMlno3eR
— The First (@TheFirstonTV) July 23, 2024
As the Democratic Party grapples with internal debates and external pressures, a contentious topic has emerged: the notion that the party has hijacked democracy by hand-picking the new presidential nominee without a vote. This issue has sparked significant controversy and raised questions about the democratic processes within the party.
Internal Party Turmoil
In recent months, prominent Democratic figures have voiced their concerns about President Joe Biden’s candidacy for the 2024 election. With fears of a Republican landslide looming, several House Democrats, including Earl Blumenauer and Michael Bennet, have called on Biden to step aside, citing potential down-ballot repercussions and the risk of a Trump resurgence. The debate has intensified as more party members, including celebrities like George Clooney, advocate for new leadership to prevent a Republican victory.
The Decision-Making Process
The controversy centers around the perception that Democratic leaders are bypassing traditional democratic processes by not holding a vote to select the presidential nominee. Critics argue that this approach undermines the principles of democracy and disenfranchises party members who deserve a say in the decision. The cancellation of major fundraisers and the growing calls for Biden to prove his cognitive fitness have only added fuel to the fire.
Democracy at Stake
The broader implications of this internal conflict extend beyond the Democratic Party. As Democrats attempt to galvanize their base by emphasizing the threat to democracy posed by election denialism and the January 6 insurrection, they face the challenge of connecting these abstract concepts to voters’ immediate concerns. Despite efforts to highlight the importance of democracy, many voters remain focused on economic issues, making it difficult for the party to gain traction with this messaging.
The Way Forward
As the Democratic Party navigates this complex landscape, the focus remains on securing a path to victory in the upcoming elections. Some strategists believe that a late push emphasizing the importance of democracy could make a difference in close races, but skepticism persists about the effectiveness of this strategy. The party’s ability to unite and present a cohesive message will be crucial in determining its success in the 2024 election.In conclusion, the notion that the Democrats have hijacked democracy by hand-picking the new presidential nominee without a vote is a contentious issue that highlights the internal struggles and broader challenges facing the party. As Democrats strive to balance the need for strong leadership with the principles of democratic participation, the outcome of this debate will have significant implications for the future of the party and the nation.