“Unpacking Pierre Poilievre’s Dog-Whistling: How His Rhetoric Appeals to White Privilege”
Pierre Poilievre is a Canadian politician and member of the Conservative Party of Canada. He has come under scrutiny in recent years for his use of dog-whistling tactics and his alleged courting of extremist groups. These tactics are dangerous and divisive, and have no place in Canadian politics.
No. It’s actually social science. He makes religious white conservatives feel he’ll preserve their white Christian privilege because he tells them Trudeau is a threat to it. And you share similar values, apparently. White people have never been oppressed, Ryan. Grow up. https://t.co/izZ0hIwhIk
— Dean Blundell🇨🇦 (@ItsDeanBlundell) February 14, 2023
Let’s take a closer look at some examples of Pierre Poilievre’s dog-whistling and his alleged courting of extremists.
Example #1: Dog-whistling to anti-Muslim sentiment
Pierre Poilievre has been accused of dog-whistling to anti-Muslim sentiment in Canada. In 2015, he criticized the government’s decision to allow Syrian refugees into the country, arguing that it would put Canadian lives at risk. This statement is a classic example of dog-whistling, as it implies that Muslim refugees are a threat to Canadian security. Far-right groups have used this kind of rhetoric to stoke fear and hatred towards Muslims in Canada.
This Poilievre tweet is not going over well: people point out Poilievre voted against M-103 anti-Islamophobia motion in 2017 after 6 Muslims were murdered in QUE.; he also supported the Barbaric Cultural Practices Act seen as “the very definition of Islamophobic legislation.” https://t.co/nApvgwFVt2
— David Pugliese (@davidpugliese) March 20, 2022
Example #2: Attending events hosted by far-right groups
Pierre Poilievre has also been accused of attending events hosted by far-right groups. In 2018, he spoke at a rally organized by the yellow vest movement, a group known for its anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim sentiment. This kind of association with extremist groups can be seen as a way of courting their support, and it has been criticized by many as irresponsible and dangerous.
But if Trudeau met with, or appointed to a minister position, someone anti-Indigenous anti-LGBTQ anti-democratic anti-Muslim anti-police anti-law anti-science or anti-secular, Poilievre would be OK with it? pic.twitter.com/IzQOGqoh4G
— Andrew 🇺🇦 (@TheMandrewCan) January 28, 2023
Example #3: Legitmizing the Far Right under the guise of “democracy”
Pierre Poilievre has been accused of supporting Diagolon and other far right groups, described as anti-Muslim, anti-semitic and anti-immigrant. In 2022, Poilievre claims they, like him, were fighting for freedom and democracy. This kind of association with extremist groups is deeply concerning, and has been criticized by many as a way of legitimizing their views and providing them with a platform.
https://twitter.com/Theobius/status/1614321863429361664?s=20
Jeremy MacKenzie, leader of the Diagolon collective whose members allegedly plotted to kill RCMP officers and who is himself facing weapons charges, seems to have bent Poilievre's ear at a recent Halifax campaign event.
(I wouldn't expect Poilievre to recognize MacKenzie.) pic.twitter.com/ymXWoXf9Sw
— Justin Ling (Has Left) (@Justin_Ling) August 20, 2022
Example #4: Using anti-immigrant rhetoric
Pierre Poilievre has used anti-immigrant rhetoric in his political speeches and statements. “Reclaim whats yours” and “Take Back Canada” aren’t just cool slogans Pierre wanted on T-shirts.
"Take back control" – Leave campaign, Brexit referendum 2016
"Take back Canada" – Erin O'Toole, 2020
"Take back control of your life" and now "Reclaim what has always been yours" – Pierre Poilievre, 2022
Similar themes.— RF 🇺🇦 (@dipbrat70) July 3, 2022
Example #5: Courting support from the far-right
Pierre Poilievre has been accused of courting support from the far-right in Canada. In 2019, he attended a fundraiser hosted by the United We Roll movement, a group known for its anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim sentiment. This kind of association with extremist groups can be seen as a way of appealing to their supporters, and it has been criticized by many as a way of legitimizing their views and providing them with a platform. And do we have to talk about Pierre’s public support for the #FluTruxKlan, marching with extremists he later abandoned when he became leader of the opposition?
The Convoy Clowns were literally terrifying the residents of Ottawa last year and paralyzing the city. Pierre Poilievre was rewarding them with coffee and donuts for doing it. pic.twitter.com/ZgLnCQjsRg
— Vicki Campbell🇨🇦 (@merry123459) February 15, 2023
Conclusion
Pierre Poilievre’s use of dog-whistling tactics and his alleged courting of extremist groups is deeply concerning. These tactics have been used by far-right groups to stoke fear and hatred towards marginalized communities in Canada. As Canadians, we must call out this behavior and demand better from our political leaders. We must work together to build a more inclusive and tolerant Canada that embraces the contributions of all its citizens, regardless of their race, religion, or ethnicity.